Questions concerning criminal law Essay

i. What ar the specific aims & axerophthol purposes of the un rightful nessful law? To what extent does the illegal law control behaviour? Do you believe that the law is too regulatory or non restricting sufficient?The specific aims and purposes of bend law is to vindicate criminals, and pr take downt plurality from becoming future tense criminals by using deterrence. Having a criminal uprightice system that imposes liability and penalisation for violations deter. (Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does criminal rectitude monish?A Behavioural wisdom Investigation, Oxford ledger of Legal studies, volume 24, zero(prenominal) 2 (2004), pp. 173-205). iniquitous law intimidates citizens because intimately citizenry wont want to be arrested or take on a issue up on their in-person record. Criminal law controls behaviour unless precisely step forwardlines what a good citizen should be doing, by creating laws. More precisely, the term refers to substantive criminal law a corpse of law that prohibits certain kinds of conduct and imposes sanctions for unlawful behaviour.(The Canadian Encyclopedia, Criminal Law, http//www.the digestadianencyclopedia.com/articles/criminal-law, para. 1.) Having laws and not enforcing them is pointless, so by creating a law you need to compel it strictly so people limp intrustting the offence. Like in Alberta and separate part of Canada the Distracted Driving law was in full ensn atomic number 18 and bothone caught texting and impulsive or anything along those lines was given a major(ip) demerit dock, and a hefty slate you need to pay.By doing this it enforces the law and creates that vox populi in the back of the citizens head that says should I do that? What will happen if I text and drive and get caught?. However, near criminals dont realize that unconscious thought and dont respectableguard if they get caught breaking the law, thats wherefore so many an(prenominal) criminals atomic number 18 re-offenders. Laws are either questions concerning criminal justice and goloshtoo restrictive or not restrictive enough dep endpoint on where you live. any(prenominal) people can be considered criminals in Canada, solely be doing family honour killings in their home baseland. Having pretty more(prenominal) than non existent inebriety progresss in Europe to the United States where you have to be 21 is absolutely unreason adapted, and depending on where you live your laws can either be too restrictive, like in the US, or not restrictive at all, in Europe.There should be a comprehensive drinking age of 16, and the driving age should be raised. Allowing teenagers and late adults to drive in the first plate they learn the effects of drinking is not a good policy. Too many citizens infer because they have been driving for 2 4 years see that they can drive drunk which is not the gaffe and creates a giving problem. Among 18 24 year olds, they have the mellowedest pe rcentage in Canada for driving under the stoop per 100,000 certify patrons.Universally, if you lowered the drinking age and heightened the driving age to 21, hopefully less people would be drinking and driving because much than people would have experienced the effect of alcohol before driving. If this actually worked accordly maybe less and less natural law officers would need to fear about blockade stops and be less restrictive on certain laws and would be able to focus on other(a) important things around Canada.questions concerning criminal justice and asylum ii. Assuming that males are to a greater extent boisterous than females does that mean that criminal offense has a biological rather than a social prat (because males & females share a exchangeable environwork forcet)? Statistically males made up for more then five times the beat of crime then females did in 2005. (Wo custody and The Criminal jurist System, http//www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-503-x/201 0001/article/11416-eng.htm.)Males arent biologically programmed to be more physically aggressive and commit more crimes, but when people say males commit more crimes because of testosterone, that is crazy because women have testosterone in their carcasss too. Males commit more crimes because just about males want to assert their macho ness to females and prove that they are manlike. When males are 20-25 years old, the highest category for committing a crime, they have no other ways to show females how manly they are other then conflict and committing crimes.I think the reason why older males dont commit more crimes compared to the younger generation is because older folk have other ways to show their manliness like their job, how much money they have, or the kind of railway car that they drive. That organism said crime has zero to do with biology, but it comes down to men trying to show how powerful they are in an attempt to woo a female.Concerning the fact that males an d females sharing the same surround but males organism more tough, I think the reason is because males arent as protected as females are. During high work day kids always hear about fathers or brothers who will protect their churl or sibling from anyone that hurts them in any way. You never hear a babe or a mother construction that about theirquestions concerning criminal justice and guardson. (Introduction to Criminology, Lecture 3, September 23, 2013, Professor Jan Stanners.) So another factor about females being less aggressive is the fact that they are protected more and al more or less curb from certain things because more people worry about girls then boys. Studies are as tumesce showing that womens crime grade are increasing quite observably while males are slowly dropping. I think this is because since the 1950-80s womens roles were typically stay at home moms winning care of the children, etc. But outright women have a lot more freedoms and have jobs and can t hey can at present do whatever they please just like males, so I think thats why female crime rates are rising steadily.Also, according to the statscan government website it shows that females have a high victimization rate between the ages of 18-44, which we pass judgment because men are more dotty. However after that age rove the males become the more victimized mathematical group which I found very interest because that in itself refutes any debate of men being more violent because of testosterone, because no matter how old you are your body is still producing testosterone.questions concerning criminal justice and recourseiii. Do you harbor with the assessment that for young people, a school is one of the most mordacious locations in a companionship? Did you find your high school to be a dangerous environment?  match to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 17 teens were killed at schools and five children killed themselves in the year ending June 30, 2002. (School Safe ty, http//www.ncpc.org/topics/school- golosh.) School can be a very dangerous personate for teenagers depending on the area of town that they live in. In Calgary high schools are more safe down south then in Forrest Lawn just because of the type of families and people on that point are around influencing the teenagers.The type of influence a teenager gets can lend them on the path to becoming a bully. At the Columbine shootings two teenagers conjecture and killed many innocent teenagers, in Michael Moores documental it is shown that the two students were bullied occasionally which may have caused them to act out and shoot their peers. (Michael Moore, bowl For Columbine, 2002.) As far as schools being one of the most dangerous areas in the community I find that disenfranchised to believe. Around schools you have teachers and counsellors supervising you and share you throughout your 3 years so it cant be as dangerous as people slang it out to be.However the activities that take place outside of school I think are the most violent ones. They study students and peers that youve met through high school and I believe people are acquiring those two things mixed up, but thats just from personal experience because inner of my high school was relatively safe. We had a lockdown where a student from another school came into ours with a knife looking for a student in one of the classes but the police came and handled the situation accordingly and our teachers were well prepared questions concerning criminal justice and safetyand practiced lockdowns on a unremitting basis. Later we all found out this situation happened because of activity outside of school. My personal experiences in high school I never had a physical fray with anyone but in grades 10 and 11 a lot of students would make organized fights after school and a big crowd would join. I think this relates to the previous(prenominal) question on men being more violent, because teenagers have no oth er way to assert their manliness to friends and girls other then to fight and beat psyche up. I think the most dangerous places in our rural communities is back alleys at night time walking home from drinking at a friends or at a bar.You make yourself an tardily target being drunk and thats when criminals take the chance to mug you. By being at school its really hard to make yourself a big target with teaching faculty all around you. To sum everything up I do not agree that schools are the most dangerous place for young people. In some instanced even your own home could be the most dangerous place to be and school could be like an escape for some students.questions concerning criminal justice and safety write PageThe Canadian Encyclopedia, Criminal Law, http//www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/criminal-law, para. 1. Michael Moore, wheel For Columbine, 2002. Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205. School Safety, http//www.ncpc.org/topics/school-safety.Women and The Criminal Justice System, http//www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-503-x/2010001/article/11416-eng.htm.